elblogg

If you’re really trying, you will always be able to write completely unreadable code in any programming language. All the language designers attemts to force you to write readable code, and even making it so the easiest way ahead, even for quick hacks is to write it as readable and reusable code will fail if you’re really trying to write unreadable code.

This guy is obviously concerned about “job security”. (not the blog author, but the code author)

Aaannd… Heres my understanding of the code:

Okay. It’s kind of stupid to put static typing up against Unit tests. Even so, lots of people does so a lot of times in the discussion between dynamic and static programming languages.

Static typing provides you with a security net when it comes to typos. Alhough, it doesn’t give you any security against logical errors.

(more…)

So, you’re going to parse a webpage, to extract some information. For instance if you want to get the tracking information for your last online order, and you want to display the tracking information changes using growl, dbus notifications or xosd.
You know regular expressions, so you go to the job with your long range missiles ready. But wait a minute, you’ll probably solve the problem but is regular expressions really the right tool?
The pro for regular expressions is that you can use the same tool you always use for parsing jobs, but then again you doesn’t learn anything new out of this. You might fortify your position as regex wizard even more, but how about something completely different?

Now. Most webpages is written in HTML, and some even in XHTML, for HTML documents languages like Python has a built-in parser, after the model of the SAX-parser. (It’s probably the other way around, the SAX parser is built on the base of the HTML parser…) Most programming languages has good support for XML, so for XHTML documents, you can use the HTML-parser, a SAX-parser or even the XML-DOM parsers.

The benefit of doing it this way is that your parser will probably be more robust to minor changes in the webpage. You don’t reinvent the wheel (The best way I’ve found to parse HTML documents using regular expressions is to make a specialized SAX-like parser anyway). Your code will probably be readable in a year, and others might even be able to understand your code. And finally, you learn something new, which might give you a fresh view on a lot of problems.

Now back to the original issue, to make a parser for the parcel tracking of your postal service. Here’s an example parsing the shipment tracking page of posten, the norwegian postal service.

(more…)

Currently I’m developing a webservice interface for queue handling in Asterisk towards another company, that is developing a CRM solution which will utilize my webservice for Computer Telephony Integration (CTI).

So, today the developer in the other company got such an understanding of the service that he started suggesting changes. A lot of changes in the DTD etc. These changes would imply some changes in the architecture downwards in the system. It is quite scary to start tearing things apart, when you already got something working. That is, if you don’t have a large amount of unittests.

Luckily I had good unittest coverage. So changing stuff was really just a matter of changing the tests, do fit the proposed changes. Test to see where I needed to change something. Do the changes and run the tests again.

It feels very good to have proper knowledge that everything actually works properly after a refactoring like this.

Unit testing is like love. It’ll keep you going when everything else fails. (citation)

I have sort of a love/hate relationship with Python, the programming language. Coming from PHP and Java which both have excellent documentation, while lots can be said about the solutions. With Python 2.6 the documentation really has improved, but its still not really there, while the solutions are so elegant that the only reason you don’t guess how to do stuff is that it feels too simple.

Today I had one of these realizations, while reading Wayne’s snippet of the day.

Python has a really nice list-generation scheme, so you can generate lists of the content you want from another list of object with only one line of code.

Example:

Here I generated a list of whole numbers from a list of non-whole numbers.

Now We’ll take this further.
Lets say we want to filter the list, so we’ll only get the numbers that satisfy 1<=x<2.

We could do this using filter() and lambda functions. Which is totally OK. It’ll make Python newbies totally confused (which it did with me until recently, when I realized what lambda functions really are (I’ll get back to this)), but it’ll work nicely.

But wouldn’t it be nice if we could use the same list generation scheme for this as well?
Guess what. You can!

Doing the same using filter and a lambda function will look like this

and without using a lambda function:

All of these will work equally fine, and none of them is very hard to understand, as long as you keep in mind that lambda functions just are like anonymous functions/classes.

But there is something very facinating with the elegance and simplicity in the syntax of the list generator snippet.

I’ve been a subscriber of Python Magazine since January, and I’ve bought every issue there are on PDF. It is a great magazine, and I would recommend it to every pythonista out there. No, strike that, make that every programmer out there. Because we want them all to be bitten by the snake don’t we?

When people have asked me if there was anything I would complain about with the magazine, I’ve had to answer “That it takes so long time before the paper copy reaches me, that I’ve already read it all on PDF before”.

That’s not completely true. Because I like reading on paper, and waits patiently for the paper copy to fall into my mailbox.

And now It’s also completely false, because the march issue arrived today, about 15 days after it was published online, and about a week after the february issue.

So, great work guys! And the article lineup is really cool. I can’t wait to poke around with the flickr and Google Calendar API’s.

I’ve also started playing with the idea that I might write an article for them some day.

From pycon08:

Other videos from PyCon08 can be found here

Woha! Dette blir en liten skrytepost. Jeg fikk nettopp tilbake evalueringen av min forrige oblig-innlevering i INF101, og fikk 99 av 100 poeng. Jeg fikk ett poeng i trekk fordi jeg hadde glemt å legge ved et kjøreeksempel av programmet. Akkurat det var litt surt. Men 99 av 100 er likevel rimelig ok.

I took a picture of my new laptop the other day. It was then I saw how geeky my bookshelf was, containing these books:

• Web Database Applications with PHP and MySQL
• Learning XML
• Learning XSLT
• Python - how to program
• MySQL reference manual
• Programming Languages - concepts and constructs
• HTML 4.01 Specification
• Conputer Networks
• A history of modern computing
• A brief history of the future - The origins of the Internet
• Learning Java
• Data Structures and Algorithms in Java
• Designing with web standards
• On to Java
• Java network programming and distributed computing
• Windows ME annoyances
• Java som første programmeringsspråk
• Java software solutions
• Learning WML and WMLScript
• Human computer interaction

Once I had this dream of beeing a professional developer. I do not dream of that anymore, if I dream of it, it would be a nightmare. This summer i have had a few programming projects and my income this summer is based on them. I want developing to be fun, not a job. It would be better if I had an office where I could get peace to the work, and a limited part of the day where I would have to worry about getting the project done.

The way it have been this summer really makes me think that I dont even want to work with computers. But thats not really the problem. The problem is that acacemic work always take a part of your mind, even when you dont work. Or especially when you dont work. And you need good inspiration to get the work done. If you dont have just the perfect working enviroment you’ll really have to twist your mind to get those good ideas. Not too hot, not to cold, not too much noise, and no relaitves or other people expecting you to be social. There is a reason why people have the occupation that geeks are not capable of beeing social. Some geeks may even try to make this impression on their enviroment, beacause then noone will bother him while he is working.

And people are bothering us when we are working. I believe this is beacause they think that youngsters are just playing games on their computers, and are never doing anything important. When we explain that its important to get this work done they dont understand it. My explaination is just technobabble for them.